Re: "variable not found in subplan target list"

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: "variable not found in subplan target list"
Date: 2023-05-04 13:55:39
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHsZdnA1K310NwpbhpYz2-OJhiacobxGstkdLqpF2OqRg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Alvaro,

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 19:44 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:

> On 2023-May-02, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > We have an open item about this, and I see no reason not to do it. I
> > checked, and putting things back is just a matter of reverting
> > 589bb816499e and ec386948948, cleaning up some trivial pgindent-induced
> > conflicts, and bumping catversion once more. Would you like to do that
> > yourself, or do you prefer that I do it? Ideally, we'd do it before
> > beta1.
>
> I have pushed the revert now.

Thanks for taking care of it.

(Wouldn’t have been able to get to it till Monday myself.)

> --
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-05-04 16:44:02 Re: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-05-04 12:39:03 Re: PL/Python: Fix return in the middle of PG_TRY() block.