From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Richard Guo <riguo(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join |
Date: | 2020-03-01 14:21:29 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqHcjFCzzRfht2qs_Dwhia0wBsv1MS8Kwb62dWt1vR+4iw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 8:18 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:00 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Just to leave a breadcrumb in this thread --- the planner failure
> >> induced by d25ea01275 has been fixed in 529ebb20a. The difficulty
> >> with multiway full joins that Amit started this thread with remains
> >> open, but I imagine the posted patches will need rebasing over
> >> 529ebb20a.
>
> > Here are the rebased patches.
>
> The cfbot shows these patches as failing regression tests. I think
> it is just cosmetic fallout from 6ef77cf46 having changed EXPLAIN's
> choices of table alias names; but please look closer to confirm,
> and post updated patches.
Thanks for notifying.
Checked and indeed fallout from 6ef77cf46 seems to be the reason a
test is failing.
Updated patches attached.
Thanks,
Amit
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0002-Move-some-code-from-joinrel.c-to-relnode.c.patch | application/octet-stream | 12.0 KB |
v5-0001-Some-cosmetic-improvements-to-partitionwise-join-.patch | application/octet-stream | 12.9 KB |
v5-0003-Fix-partitionwise-join-to-handle-FULL-JOINs-corre.patch | application/octet-stream | 13.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2020-03-01 14:49:32 | Re: proposal \gcsv |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2020-03-01 14:05:10 | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |