Re: slight tweaks to documentation about runtime pruning

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: slight tweaks to documentation about runtime pruning
Date: 2018-12-17 14:57:09
Message-ID: CA+HiwqH2j-7knakztcuJRcDqWzn=f5QFfFUc5d1Qqt24Facp2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:49 PM Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2018-Dec-14, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> > I updated the patch. Regarding whether we should mention "(never
> > executed)", it wouldn't hurt to mention it imho, exactly because it's
> > shown in the place of showing loops=0. How about the attached?
>
> Pushed, thanks.

Thank you!

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-12-17 15:18:20 Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2018-12-17 14:56:44 Statement-level Triggers For Uniqueness Checks