From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting for pg_basebackup, in the server side |
Date: | 2020-02-06 02:07:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqGriz_GLqOpnHe5jn08v6WVgx+K9pMAfvk8wgUDySDygQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 9:51 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 18:25 Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > So, maybe you're saying that "waiting for checkpoint" is ambiguous and
> > > most people will assume it means "...to start". As for me, I assume
> > > it ends with "...to finish".
>
> I'm not sure "most peple will assume" or not, so I said "I'm not
> sure". For example, I feel strangeness to use "I'm waiting for Amit"
> to express that I'm waiting Amit to leave there. That phrase gives me
> such kind of uneasiness.
>
> I thought of "establishing checkpoint" or "running a checkpoint" as
> other candidates.
Okay, I understand. I am fine with "running checkpoint", although I
think "waiting for checkpoint" isn't totally wrong either.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-02-06 02:14:32 | typos in comments and user docs |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2020-02-06 01:54:48 | Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation |