Re: PAM implementation in PG 9.2.3

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Raghavendra <raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PAM implementation in PG 9.2.3
Date: 2013-05-13 05:47:56
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGcjzx+EL6a4Jw9dcWc8pwG-Pp_QZxTx7mn80GFX3qYGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> However, PG documentation doesn't highlight about this in psql or PAM
> section, because log entries written are slightly confusing.
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/auth-methods.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/app-psql.html

It turns out this logging is a bug in PAM authentication code in the
backend that needs to resolved. This has been reported on
pgsql-hackers.

--
Amit Langote

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2013-05-13 08:34:58 Re: In what situations do you use -U of initdb?
Previous Message Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda 2013-05-13 05:01:18 Re: In what situations do you use -U of initdb?