| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: remaining sql/json patches |
| Date: | 2023-11-11 02:56:24 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqGR6Q7u6poGbxEjY0aTT=Knrv2XDHj_YZpdNrHu=Tm9XQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Erik,
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 11:52 Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment, what is the patchset to be tested? The latest SQL/JSON
> server I have is from September, and it's become unclear to me what
> belongs to the SQL/JSON patchset. It seems to me cfbot erroneously
> shows green because it successfully compiles later detail-patches (i.e.,
> not the SQL/JSON set itself). Please correct me if I'm wrong and it is
> in fact possible to derive from cfbot a patchset that are the ones to
> use to build the latest SQL/JSON server.
I’ll be posting a new set that addresses Andres’ comments early next week.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-11-11 03:59:43 | Re: pg_walfile_name_offset can return inconsistent values |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-11-11 02:55:29 | Re: locked reads for atomics |