| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, sanyo(dot)moura(at)tatic(dot)net, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |
| Date: | 2019-01-19 12:17:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqGEaU79m0vrT+B5hEg=tWbMwjc4YXdx7cuzfV9dbE44EQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:58 PM Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I updated the patch as such and rebased it to the latest HEAD. I also
> added the commit message. Attached is an updated patch. Does that make
> sense? If there are no objections, I'll push that patch early next week.
Thank you. Looks good to me.
Regards,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-01-19 13:05:49 | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-01-19 12:07:42 | Re: problems with foreign keys on partitioned tables |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2019-01-21 08:17:53 | Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions 10.5 and 11.0 |
| Previous Message | Luis Carril | 2019-01-18 18:02:43 | Re: JIT overhead slowdown |