Re: remaining sql/json patches

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date: 2024-01-16 10:00:29
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFyc2iW8UkwMA7n0oiCMwF5sVow1S=1hzjg+539wxoABw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Thought I'd share an update.

I've been going through Jian He's comments (thanks for the reviews!),
most of which affect the last JSON_TABLE() patch and in some cases the
query functions patch (0007). It seems I'll need to spend a little
more time, especially on the JSON_TABLE() patch, as I'm finding things
to improve other than those mentioned in the comments.

As for the preliminary patches 0001-0006, I'm thinking that it would
be a good idea to get them out of the way sooner rather than waiting
till the main patches are in perfect shape. I'd like to get them
committed by next week after a bit of polishing, so if anyone would
like to take a look, please let me know. I'll post a new set
tomorrow.

0007, the query functions patch, also looks close to ready, though I
might need to change a few things in it as I work through the
JSON_TABLE() changes.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Lakt 2024-01-16 10:24:02 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Previous Message Melih Mutlu 2024-01-16 09:41:22 Re: Parent/child context relation in pg_get_backend_memory_contexts()