From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx |
Date: | 2023-10-26 03:01:59 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqFmjNcR+YLLiHoe3n7xsEmRt=T=SDFJD78h8Bt1hQZVwA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:31 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:51 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Diff looks fine, but I'm not sure that it's appropriate to characterize
> >> the existing code as an oversight. It was a necessary hack while the
> >> executor was behaving as it did (ie, using the first child as root).
>
> > Ah, you're right. I've updated the commit message. Will push later today.
>
> I'd suggest specifying *first* child RTE in the commit message.
> LGTM otherwise.
Thanks for checking. Pushed after changing the commit message like that.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2023-10-26 14:01:11 | BUG #18170: Unexpected error: no relation entry for relid 3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-26 02:31:49 | Re: AW: AW: BUG #18147: ERROR: invalid perminfoindex 0 in RTE with relid xxxxx |