From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib |
Date: | 2013-06-14 13:02:00 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqFYTRaLWvyemJ1vwCJUVXtbceMieLdqDsVUEo9NO6A=ng@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 6/13/13 9:20 PM, amul sul wrote:
>> Agree, only if we consider these contrib module is always gonna deployed with the postgresql.
>> But, what if user going to install such module elsewhere i.e. not from contrib directory of pg source.
>
> Why would anyone do that?
Is he probably saying "install such module *from* elsewhere"? Like
directly from the source directory of a module using something like
following:
cd /path/to/module-source
make USE_PGXS=1 PG_CONFIG=/path/to/pg_config
make USE_PGXS=1 PG_CONFIG=/path/to/pg_config install
When user does not work with pg source directly and does not have
postgresql-contrib installed?
Am I missing something here?
--
Amit Langote
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-06-14 13:08:15 | Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-06-14 12:35:55 | Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib |