Re: Postgres 11 release notes

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Date: 2018-05-18 15:58:04
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFMDYFLMURJm4gike925E2BSsB7yiAUAHQNSOyROcuV4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Hi Bruce.

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2018/05/15 5:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I like it, done.
>
> Thank you.

I wonder what you think about including this little performance item:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1eotSQ-0005V0-LV@gemulon.postgresql.org

especially considering the part of the commit message which states

...Still, testing shows
that this makes single-row inserts significantly faster on a table
with many partitions without harming the bulk-insert case.

I recall seeing those inserts being as much as 2x faster as partition
count grows beyond hundreds. One might argue that we should think
about publicizing this only after we've dealt with the
lock-all-partitions issue that's also mentioned in the commit message
which is still a significant portion of the time spent and I'm totally
fine with that.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-05-18 16:01:01 Re: PG 11 feature count
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-05-18 15:56:22 Re: Postgres 11 release notes

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-05-19 12:35:57 Re: SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-05-18 15:56:22 Re: Postgres 11 release notes