From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
Date: | 2018-05-18 15:58:04 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqFMDYFLMURJm4gike925E2BSsB7yiAUAHQNSOyROcuV4A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Hi Bruce.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2018/05/15 5:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I like it, done.
>
> Thank you.
I wonder what you think about including this little performance item:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1eotSQ-0005V0-LV@gemulon.postgresql.org
especially considering the part of the commit message which states
...Still, testing shows
that this makes single-row inserts significantly faster on a table
with many partitions without harming the bulk-insert case.
I recall seeing those inserts being as much as 2x faster as partition
count grows beyond hundreds. One might argue that we should think
about publicizing this only after we've dealt with the
lock-all-partitions issue that's also mentioned in the commit message
which is still a significant portion of the time spent and I'm totally
fine with that.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-05-18 16:01:01 | Re: PG 11 feature count |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-05-18 15:56:22 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-05-19 12:35:57 | Re: SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-05-18 15:56:22 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |