Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: German Becker <german(dot)becker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL segments (names) not in a sequence
Date: 2013-05-24 13:01:31
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFFeckomHyN8+q=w+TfnkogBEPLk7DY-ek_m39U=MDvFw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Maybe I didn't explain correctly. I am using COPY/pg_dump/pg_restore for
> migration (and it is working fine). The streaming replication is for
> hot-standby replication *once migrated*. Thing is I disbable archving and
> set wal_level to minimal, when migrating the large portion of data, to make
> it faster. Then I switch to wal_level=hot_standby, i.e the "production"
> configuration, and the WAL segment seuqence seems to overlap with the
> segments generated with the other setting.
>

Though, now you understand it's not what it looks like, right? :-)

--
Amit Langote

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-05-24 13:21:32 Re: Cost limited statements RFC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-05-24 12:57:24 Re: Patch to .gitignore