Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
Date: 2019-12-23 16:09:54
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFBwbmkqvKM-CmoK6yOcokwWcOzjz-fP1O317qn8kgGEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 23:49 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqFucUh7hYkfZ6x1MVcs_R24eUfNVuRwdE_FwuwK8XpSZg%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Oh, interesting --- I hadn't been paying much attention to that thread.
> I'll compare your PoC there to what I did.

Actually, I should’ve said that your patch is much better attempt at
getting this in order, so there’s not much to see in my patch really. :)

Thanks,
Amit

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mahendra Singh 2019-12-23 17:31:49 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-12-23 15:00:20 Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys