| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: \d doesn't show partitioned table foreign keys |
| Date: | 2018-05-14 15:49:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqF-7zY-Ok45qQ928c0gXZD8Nr0Qf-tWEwcnbCSA_5p83w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:38 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2018-May-14, Amit Langote wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I just noticed $subject, which attached seems to fix, although not sure if
>> that's the correct fix for the issue.
>
> The fix looks good to me. Will push shortly.
Thank you.
> A related issue is that \d of the referenced table shows both the
> partitioned table as well as all of its partitions, which seems too
> repetitive. I think we should only list the partitioned table itself.
> Thoughts?
Yeah, I think showing only the partitioned table makes sense, assuming
that the triggers and constraint entries on the partitions are an
implementation detail. Right?
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-05-14 17:00:53 | Re: Incorrect path in header comment identification |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-05-14 15:38:39 | Re: \d doesn't show partitioned table foreign keys |