| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: remaining sql/json patches |
| Date: | 2024-11-11 00:28:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqExUo=EoP74JCm7Ge7y1A82SO+rE4A4amqgWXSL4Qdjig@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Nikita,
On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 5:22 PM Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> We'd like to help to implement SQL/JSON in v18 and have adapted the JSON_TABLE PLAN clause code
> from patch v45-0001-JSON_TABLE.patch.
Nice, thanks.
I think it might be better to start a new thread for your patch and
please write a description of how it works.
> Could you please review it? There are some places with questionable behavior - please check the JSON_TABLE
> plan execution section in tests, and I'm not sure about the correctness of some tests.
I will try to make some time to review it in the January fest.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2024-11-11 00:51:51 | Re: Eager aggregation, take 3 |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-11-11 00:21:31 | Re: pg_stat_statements: Avoid holding excessive lock |