From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods |
Date: | 2019-11-07 01:58:51 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqEpNi21RYiyvKaio445c=Q+9qwx-RZyRZKvri45No2WHQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:54 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:49:38AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > I looked around but don't understand why these macros need to be
> > exposed. I read this comment:
> >
> > * Note that this is more or less the same that fillRelOptions does, so only
> > * use this if you need to do something non-standard within some option's
> > * code block.
> >
> > but don't see how an AM author might be able to do something
> > non-standard with this interface.
> >
> > Maybe Alvaro knows this better.
>
> Perhaps there is a point in cleaning up all that more, but I am not
> sure that it is worth potentially breaking other people's code.
Sure. Maybe, we could add a deprecation note for these more
fine-grained APIs like my first patch did.
+/*
+ * Using parseRelOptions(), allocateReloptStruct(), and fillRelOptions()
+ * directly is Deprecated; use build_reloptions() instead.
+ */
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-07 02:13:56 | Re: Checking return value of SPI_execute |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-07 01:54:29 | Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods |