Re: Doc Rework: Section 9.16.13 SQL/JSON Query Functions

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc Rework: Section 9.16.13 SQL/JSON Query Functions
Date: 2024-06-28 05:56:39
Message-ID: CA+HiwqEmM95hVC4RK9NT6ksh-pTbFw4_K98dx-W6iTLZY2xD3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi David,

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 3:47 PM David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hey!
>
> Lots of SQL/JSON threads going about. This one is less about technical correctness and more about usability of the documentation. Though in writing this I am finding some things that aren't quite clear. I'm going to come back with those on a follow-on post once I get a chance to make my second pass on this. But for the moment just opening it up to a content and structure review.
>
> Please focus on the text changes. It passes "check-docs" but I still need to work on layout and stuff in html (markup, some more links).
>
> Thanks!
>
> David J.
>
> p.s. v1 exists here (is just the idea of using basically variable names in the function signature and minimizing direct syntax in the table);
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwbYBvUZasGj_ZnfXhC2kk4AT%3DepwGkNd2%3DRMMVXkfTNMQ%40mail.gmail.com

Thanks for writing the patch. I'll take a look at this next Monday.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2024-06-28 06:13:53 Re: pgsql: Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-06-28 05:27:06 Re: SQL/JSON query functions context_item doc entry and type requirement