Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Date: 2022-04-07 01:05:36
Message-ID: CA+HiwqEhV8s=qTWmPUzsrPJ1wh-VCE97M7QesL8C42mEeZwXjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

There were rebase conflicts with the recently committed
execPartition.c/h changes. While fixing them, I thought maybe
find_leaf_part_for_key() doesn't quite match in style with its
neighbors in execPartition.h, so changed it to
ExecGetLeafPartitionForKey().

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v15-0001-Add-isolation-tests-for-snapshot-behavior-in-ri_.patch application/octet-stream 6.5 KB
v15-0002-Avoid-using-SPI-for-some-RI-checks.patch application/octet-stream 40.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-04-07 01:16:05 Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-04-07 00:48:51 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70