| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: problem with RETURNING and update row movement |
| Date: | 2021-04-23 01:08:16 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqEVSYbzqZ4hb0x=vbVSvuqNjMx5bXNLDXiVSrt-THPzPg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 12:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I think we should also add slot != srcSlot to this condition.
>
> Good idea, should save useless comparisons of identical tupdescs.
> Done.
>
> >> (I've not looked at porting this to v12 or v11 yet.)
>
> > I did that; patches attached. (I haven't changed them to incorporate
> > the above comment though.)
>
> Thanks for that, saved me some work. I've pushed these.
Thanks for working on closing this and that other issue.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-04-23 01:25:53 | Re: wal stats questions |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2021-04-23 01:05:46 | Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table) |