| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber |
| Date: | 2022-06-15 02:41:40 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqEVKM=9GWzBHtTs0AcBg2kN57mGdXyK+TRz4zoLJAGg_Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 9:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 1:02 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > +# Change the column order of table on publisher
> > I think it might be better to say something specific to describe the
> > test intent, like:
> >
> > Test that replication into partitioned target table continues to works
> > correctly when the published table is altered
>
> Okay changed this and slightly modify the comments and commit message.
> I am just attaching the HEAD patches for the first two issues.
LGTM, thanks.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-06-15 03:22:19 | RE: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-06-15 02:39:16 | Re: better page-level checksums |