From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Youki Shiraishi <shiraishi(at)computer(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode |
Date: | 2019-09-27 04:12:24 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqEDZet3dguM8Dmc75iTu318Kv0WhRSu5rp_RdPWF=cvAQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 1:03 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:29:08PM +0900, Youki Shiraishi wrote:
> > I also vote to get rid of such ambiguous stuff.
> > As you can see by grepping, "bootstrap-mode backend" (and something
> > like that) is also called in the sources as:
> >
> > - bootstrap backend
> > - (basic) bootstrap process
> > - backend running in bootstrap mode
> > - postgres (backend) program in bootstrap mode
> > - bootstrapper
> >
> > I think "bootstrap backend" is a strong candidate for an alternative
> > of "bootstrapper" because it is used in the official documentation of
> > initdb.
>
> It seems to me that "backend running in bootstrap mode" would be the
> most consistent way to define that state in a backend process:
> $ git grep -i "bootstrap mode backend" | wc -l
> 0
> $ git grep -i "bootstrap-mode" | wc -l
> 0
> $ git grep -i "bootstrap mode" | wc -l
> 68
> $ git grep -i "bootstrap process" | wc -l
> 9
>
> "bootstrapper" sounds weird. My 2c.
Alright, count me in on the "bootstrap mode backend" side too. :)
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-09-27 04:13:02 | Re: dropdb --force |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-27 04:03:12 | Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode |