From: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Building for 64-bit platform |
Date: | 2020-11-08 19:31:23 |
Message-ID: | CA+FnnTzU6feGXQPmGVFMQKcyYoJz-_5ZQBuKPOZkxQvU3Ke93w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thx.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:15 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I build libpq with the standard configure/dmake.
> > Now I realize I need t build it for a 64-bit platform.
>
> > My questions are:
> > Is it enough to ust do
>
> Do "make distclean" at the top level, then re-configure with the
> new options and re-make.
>
> Maybe you can get away with a partial rebuild, but there is no way
> that it's worth your time to experiment. On any machine built in
> the last two decades, you could have already finished a full rebuild
> in the time it took me to type this. On the other hand, if you do
> a partial rebuild and it turns out to be broken, you could waste
> many hours figuring that out.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Igor Korot | 2020-11-08 19:35:52 | Different bitness |
Previous Message | Susan Hurst | 2020-11-08 19:09:01 | Re: Foreign Data Wrapper Handler |