From: | Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marcus Engene <mengpg2(at)engene(dot)se> |
Cc: | POSTGRESQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: copy expensive local view to an RDS instance |
Date: | 2014-05-06 15:30:14 |
Message-ID: | CA+6hpam1hTFq3N=q8Ske26K-9PYPdEi1Ta+S3MzX6QFRJCousA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>> A very quick search shows that rds supports dblink
> Then I'd need to open our servers to external visits.
This is sort of getting away from Postgres, but if the RDS instance is
in a VPC, you could put a VPN on the VPC so dblink wouldn't have to go
over the open Internet.
Paul
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Marcus Engene <mengpg2(at)engene(dot)se> wrote:
> On 06/05/14 16:58, bricklen wrote:
>>
>>
>> A very quick search shows that rds supports dblink, so perhaps that would
>> work.
>> http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/CHAP_PostgreSQL.html
>
>
> Then I'd need to open our servers to external visits. It would be lovely if
> dblink_exec could push a subselect of data instead instead of pull from RDS.
> Does this make sense?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Marcus
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
_________________________________
Pulchritudo splendor veritatis.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcus Engene | 2014-05-06 15:30:23 | Re: copy expensive local view to an RDS instance |
Previous Message | bricklen | 2014-05-06 15:15:12 | Re: copy expensive local view to an RDS instance |