From: | Seref Arikan <serefarikan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Kroon <plakroon(at)gmail(dot)com>, Raghavendra <raghavendra(dot)rao(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: create table in memory |
Date: | 2012-11-27 16:06:26 |
Message-ID: | CA+4ThdqS9oqMQrGORstr1+JW3BUznSs1brHtNHKSe3yg0L_NFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have a function that creates a temp table, inserts rows into it, performs
joins, and returns a single integer as a result. This is pg 9.1. All
sessions are using the exact same temp table structure.
re performance requirements: I need this function to return as fast as
possible :) On a production server, if the function can complete in around
10-20 milliseconds, it would be really good (below 10 ms would be great).
The average number of inserted into temp table is around 800, and there are
about 10 columns in the current design.
Kind regards
Seref
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Seref Arikan <serefarikan(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> > Also I need those tables per session, so creating and dropping with
> TEMP
> >> > tables appear to be faster.
> >>
> >> Performance of creating tables is going to be storage bound. what are
> >> your performance requirements? Even if the temp table itself is moved
> >> to ramdisk you have catalog updating. Usually from performance
> >> standpoint, creation of temp tables is not interesting -- but there
> >> are exceptions. If you need extremely fast creation/drop of tempe
> >> tables, you probably need to reorganize into permanent table with
> >> session local records using various tricks.
> >
> >
> > I am very interested in what you've written in the last sentence above,
> > since it is exactly what my requirement is. Could you explain that a bit
> > more?
>
> Well, first,
> *) is your temporary data session or transaction local (transaction
> meaning for duration of function call or till 'commit').
> *) if 'transaction' above, what version postgres? if 9.1+ let's
> explore use of wcte
> *) what are your performance requirements in detail
> *) are all sessions using same general structure of temp table(s)?
>
> merlin
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-11-27 16:39:50 | Re: Renamng the file "MSG00001.bin" to "MSG00001.msg" for internal usage placed in src/bin/pgevent |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-11-27 15:50:51 | Re: create table in memory |