From: | kaido vaikla <kaido(dot)vaikla(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol |
Date: | 2023-06-13 06:16:08 |
Message-ID: | CA+427g9r92sV6PFVsGY7ftR_XqEhhGMVujTyK0v1Y+Pef9jNfA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thnx.
br
Kaido
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 03:16, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:03:24PM +0300, kaido vaikla wrote:
> > I have noticed, if query comes from PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, then query_id
> > is not present in pg_stat_activity. Erik Wienhold figured out that
> reason
> > can be in extended query protocol (
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1391613709.939460.1684777418070@office.mailbox.org
> > )
> > My question is, is it expected or is it a bug: if extended query protocol
> > then no query_id in pg_stat_activity for running query.
>
> Well, you could say a bit of both, I guess. The query ID is compiled
> and stored in backend entries only after parse analysis, which is not
> something that would happen when using the execution phase of the
> extended query protocol, though it should be possible to access to the
> Query nodes in the cached plans and their assigned query IDs.
>
> FWIW, I'd like to think that we could improve the situation, requiring
> a mix of calling pgstat_report_query_id() while feeding on some query
> IDs retrieved from CachedPlanSource->query_list. I have not in
> details looked at how much could be achieved, TBH.
> --
> Michael
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-06-13 06:18:30 | Re: pg_get_indexdef() modification to use TxnSnapshot |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-06-13 06:11:42 | Re: Improving FTS for Greek |