Re: Does the POSITION() function takes into account the COLLATION... or not ?!?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Pierre-Aurélien GEORGES <Pierre-Aurelien(dot)GEORGES(at)univ-cotedazur(dot)fr>
Cc: pageorge(at)unice(dot)fr, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Does the POSITION() function takes into account the COLLATION... or not ?!?
Date: 2022-02-16 14:07:08
Message-ID: CA+3yvDOTyxkUUyTk-KqOH_RE9gxC-hjYPndPZRJwjxSBHod23g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:01 PM Pierre-Aurélien GEORGES <
Pierre-Aurelien(dot)GEORGES(at)univ-cotedazur(dot)fr> wrote:

> ok, let's take it forwards, then :-)
>
> Can someone provide some examples where a supported deterministic
> collation is having an impact on the result of a call to function
> POSITION() ?
>

There are no such cases currently.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-02-16 16:10:08 Re: Does the POSITION() function takes into account the COLLATION... or not ?!?
Previous Message Pierre-Aurélien GEORGES 2022-02-16 11:01:18 Re: Does the POSITION() function takes into account the COLLATION... or not ?!?