From: | Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Coccinelle for PostgreSQL development [2/N]: autoconf support [RESEND] |
Date: | 2025-01-07 20:27:42 |
Message-ID: | CA+14426_1cau-0686xRKwvd8fa4_DwZH6DZop2-B-XAY4r8pXA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 8:56 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> On 7 Jan 2025, at 20:54, Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 8:51 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> > On 7 Jan 2025, at 20:47, Mats Kindahl <mats(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > This second patch adds support for coccicheck
>>
>> Forgive me if I'm daft, but I feel there is a slight lack of context here.
>> What is coccicheck, what would it do and why would it benefit us to have
>> it?
>>
>
> There is a first email that just gives a basic description of what it is,
> with the "[1/N]" in the title. I am not sure if that explains things better.
>
>
> Thanks, went looking and found it in my spam folder, sorry for the noise.
>
Great that you found it. :)
--
Best wishes,
Mats Kindahl, Timescale
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2025-01-07 20:33:51 | Re: strangely worded message |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-01-07 20:14:36 | Re: Moving the vacuum GUCs' docs out of the Client Connection Defaults section |