From: | Ian Campbell <ianrc72(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Unstable C Function |
Date: | 2016-09-22 05:59:12 |
Message-ID: | CA+0FpjVS6SR1kgxOhAuyZvnT4Nob=P1rcE_U3+zppoeHUZJg2g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks for personally replying, Tom. I appreciate it.
You are correct. In the interim, I found the following change solved the
issue:
SPI_finish(); // move to here
SRF_RETURN_DONE(funcctx);
I'll look into tuplestore. Thanks for the hint. Fixed IMMUTABLE.
Regards
Ian Campbell
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:29 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ian Campbell <ianrc72(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > The function works fine on first call, sometimes more, then either resets
> > the connection or throws this on any further calls:
> > ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 0 SQL state: XX000
>
> I think the core problem here is that you're dealing with
> pass-by-reference results from the SPI_execute() --- specifically,
> the int4[] "vals" values --- as if they were pass-by-value. You're
> just saving the Datums, which are only pointers, and expecting what
> they point to to still be good when you get around to doing
> heap_form_tuple with them. But in reality they stopped being good
> the moment you did SPI_finish().
>
> The failures would be a lot less intermittent if you were testing in
> a debug build (with CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY defined).
>
> The two basic approaches you could take that would work reliably are
>
> 1. Copy all the int4[] values into the multi_call_memory_ctx before
> doing SPI_finish.
>
> 2. Instead of using multi-call mode, form all the result tuples during
> a single call and return them in a tuplestore, so that all the work
> is done before you call SPI_finish. You wouldn't really need the FIFO
> data structure if you did it that way.
>
> There are some other things I could criticize here, like labeling the
> function IMMUTABLE when its results depend on table contents, but
> they probably aren't causing your crashes.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | FarjadFarid(ChkNet) | 2016-09-22 10:18:56 | Re: json select question |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2016-09-22 04:14:42 | Re: Extract date from a TIMESTAMP(6) WITHOUT TIME ZONE NOT NULL column |