From: | Zhaomo Yang <zhy001(at)cs(dot)ucsd(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Implementation of global temporary tables? |
Date: | 2015-07-19 20:59:02 |
Message-ID: | CA+0EDdCCvXawsaL86giPNRiE0UmeEgONyu+wpzzwYoj_uaHkBQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Just to be clear, the idea of a global temp table is that the table def
> is available to all users, but the data is private to each session?
The table def is visible to all sessions and persistent, but the data is
private to each session and temporary.
Thanks,
Zhaomo
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-07-19 21:21:12 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-07-19 20:56:20 | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape |