From: | Nicholas White <n(dot)j(dot)white(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Troels Nielsen <bn(dot)troels(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls |
Date: | 2013-09-29 20:32:21 |
Message-ID: | CA+=vxNZKaxW-7r063khkcnwS525=MzBY+_vkuOZofb0rCXpBuw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> bms_add_member() is an accident waiting to happen
I've attached a patch that makes it use repalloc as suggested - is it
OK to commit separately? I'll address the lead-lag patch comments in
the next couple of days. Thanks -
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
repalloc.patch | application/octet-stream | 758 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-09-29 23:09:34 | Re: Bugfix and new feature for PGXS |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-09-29 17:53:23 | Re: review: psql and pset without any arguments |