From: | Dipesh Dangol <ddipeshdan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgjdbc logical replication client throwing exception |
Date: | 2017-09-15 21:32:18 |
Message-ID: | CA+=-RVbe5jbw30uJuC0=4YTtrAWDfJOgnwsoTpePn_XVhvssFg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Vladimir,
Ya, initially I was trying with withStatusInterval(20, TimeUnit.SECONDS),
that didn't work so, then only I switched to .withStatusInterval(20,
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
but it is not working as well. I am not aware of type of test cases that
you are pointing.
Could you please send me any link for that one.
For generating the load, I am using benchmarkSQL, which will generate
around 9000
transactions per second. I am trying to run streamAPI at the same time
BenchmarskSQL is generating load. If i don't run benchmarkSQL it works fine
I mean
when there are only few transactions to replicate at a time, it works fine.
But when
I run it with that benchmarskSql and try to add some logic like some
conditions, then
it breaks down in between, most of the time within few seconds.
Hi Andres,
I haven't check the server log yet. Now, I don't access to my working
environment, I will be able to check that only on Monday. If I find any
suspicious
thing in log, I will let you know.
Thank you guys.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2017-09-15 20:00:34 +0000, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> > ++pgjdbc dev list.
> >
> > >I am facing unusual connection breakdown problem. Here is the simple
> code
> > that I am using to read WAL file:
> >
> > Does it always fails?
> > Can you create a test case? For instance, if you file a pull request with
> > the test, it will get automatically tested across various PG versions, so
> > it would be easier to reson about
> >
> > Have you tried "withStatusInterval(20, TimeUnit.SECONDS)" instead of 20
> > millis? I don't think it matter much, however 20ms seems to be an
> overkill.
>
> Also, have you checked the server log?
>
> - Andres
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2017-09-16 07:33:38 | Re: looking for a globally unique row ID |
Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2017-09-15 20:06:12 | Re: New interface to PG from Chapel? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-09-15 21:33:34 | Re: SendRowDescriptionMessage() is slow for queries with a lot of columns |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-09-15 21:26:44 | Re: More efficient truncation of pg_stat_activity query strings |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-09-15 22:29:31 | Re: [JDBC] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-09-15 20:05:16 | Re: [HACKERS] pgjdbc logical replication client throwing exception |