From: | Yuri Levinsky <yuril(at)celltick(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t |
Date: | 2014-03-16 10:57:50 |
Message-ID: | C9278837BA426D4DBDF8996DB890232612AA4E@Cobra.celltick.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Craig,
The output is:
#define SIZEOF_OFF_T 8
#define SIZEOF_VOID_P 4
#define SIZEOF_SIZE_T 4
#define SIZEOF_LONG 4
Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,f77
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6
Sincerely yours,
Yuri Levinsky, DBA
Celltick Technologies Ltd., 32 Maskit St., Herzliya 46733, Israel
Mobile: +972 54 6107703, Office: +972 9 9710239; Fax: +972 9 9710222
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Ringer [mailto:craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com] /define
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 4:41 AM
To: Yuri Levinsky; Robert Haas
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] requested shared memory size overflows size_t
On 03/04/2014 10:53 PM, Yuri Levinsky wrote:
> Please advise me: I just downloaded the source and compiled it. Sun Spark Solaris 9 is always 64 bit, I verified it with sys admin. He may run 32 bit applications as well. Have I use some special option during compilation to verify that compiled PostgreSQL is actually 64 bit app?
Many platforms include both 32-bit and 64-bit target toolchains. So you might be on a 64-bit platform, but that doesn't mean you aren't compiling a 32-bit executable.
Please run:
grep '^#define SIZEOF' config.log
and post the results.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2014-03-16 11:21:18 | Re: [RFC] What should we do for reliable WAL archiving? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-03-16 10:49:08 | Re: Upcoming back branch releases |