From: | "Wappler, Robert" <rwappler(at)ophardt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joe Kramer" <cckramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Adrian von Bidder" <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to generate unique hash-type id? |
Date: | 2010-01-29 12:13:17 |
Message-ID: | C8E2DAF0E663A948840B04023E0DE32A0252362A@w2k3server02.de.ophardt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2010-01-29, Joe Kramer wrote:
> Thanks for the answer,
>
> I am unable to use ossp_uuid due to package install and/or server
> rebuild requirement.
>
> So I am trying to roll my own, and
> digest(quote_literal(random()+random()), 'sha256'), 'hex') doesn't
work:
>
Your input value is a random number, those aren't supposed to be unique
within any predictable number of iterations. Moreover I'd suspect, that
random() + random() significantly increases the probability to create
duplicated values due to the properties of the add-operation. In the
simplest example, the first invocation may return random number 3, the
second one random number 5 creating an input of 8 for the
digest-function. Another outcome of the random number generator may
yield 7 and 1 giving the same input.
I'd suggest to use some kind of sequence or something constructed from
the primary keys. But you may still see hash collisions although the
input is different.
--
Robert...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2010-01-29 12:21:58 | Re: Primary Key Increment Doesn't Seem Correct Under Table Partition |
Previous Message | Adrian von Bidder | 2010-01-29 12:08:02 | Re: How to generate unique hash-type id? |