From: | Tena Sakai <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "ian(dot)lea(at)gmail(dot)com" <ian(dot)lea(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: trouble restoring database |
Date: | 2010-08-25 04:25:38 |
Message-ID: | C899E952.C178%tsakai@gallo.ucsf.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi Scott,
Thank you for your quick tips. I shall remember zcat (and
hopefully others).
Regards,
Tena Sakai
On 8/24/10 2:30 PM, "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Tena Sakai <tsakai(at)gallo(dot)ucsf(dot)edu> wrote:
>> Having said that, I think Ian is correct that I was missing -c flag in the
>> command below:
>> gunzip ..../dumpall20100822.0.gz | /usr/local/pgsql/bin/psql -f - postgres
>
> Quick tip, you can use zcat to get the output of a gzipped file like:
>
> zcat ..../dumpall20100822.0.gz|psql
>
> There's also zgrep, zless, zegrep, zxpdf, and zdiff. All do what it
> looks like they do.
>
>
>> Since the file got uncompressed, I am now running the command:
>> psql -f /home/tsakai/Notes/postgres/dumpall20100822.0
>> and I think it is working. It is giving messsages:
>> ERROR: role "postgres" already exists
>> STATEMENT: CREATE ROLE postgres;
>> ERROR: database "testdb" already exists
>> STATEMENT: CREATE DATABASE testdb WITH TEMPLATE = template0 OWNER =
>> postgres ENCODING = 'UTF8';
>> LOG: checkpoints are occurring too frequently (5 seconds apart)
>> HINT: Consider increasing the configuration parameter
>> "checkpoint_segments".
>>
>>
>> The last 2 lines are repeated many, many times. This is not terribly
>> Serious, is it? (I will fix it via postgresql.conf file shortly.)
>
> No. It's just telling you that from a performance perspective things
> would be faster with more checkpoint segments. Unless you spend a
> fair portion of your day restoring dbs, it's probably not big deal.
> If your machines only do a little writing at a time then you can
> probably leave it. However, increasing checkpoint segments does help
> a lot if you do handle a fair bit of writes, and it's cheap and easy
> to do.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gnanakumar | 2010-08-25 07:30:55 | last_autovacuum & last_autoanalyze showing NULL |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-08-25 03:44:41 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 x Win 2008 - slow connection |