Re: Advice on contingency plan for DAS array with separate local WAL drives

From: Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com>
To: Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Advice on contingency plan for DAS array with separate local WAL drives
Date: 2010-06-14 13:10:02
Message-ID: C83B945A.4DE9A%jamiel@istreamimaging.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On 6/14/10 8:05 AM, "Jeff Amiel" <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:

> What is recommended in terms of prep/switchover in this instance? Should we
> be rsyncing or using built-in wal-log shipping of these transaction logs to
> our stand-by server? Simply pop out these drives and hand-move them to the
> standby-server? (assuming they are not the issue in the first place)

I should note that this 'similar' server is not intended to actually be a
real warm standby server in the postgres sense...it serves other
purposes...it simply possesses the right configuration (memory, cpu) to act
as a temporary database server.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2010-06-14 13:14:37 Re: What are the minimal files required to backup a postgresql database
Previous Message Ulas Albayrak 2010-06-14 13:09:16 Re: Moving a live production database to different server and postgres release