Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.

From: Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Amiel <becauseimjeff(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.
Date: 2010-06-08 18:04:38
Message-ID: C833F066.4B4C8%jamiel@istreamimaging.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 6/8/10 12:56 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com> writes:
>> On a side note, I am 100% sure that autovacuum was disabled when I brought
>> the database back up after the core dump(s). However, minutes after
>> restarting, some of my larger tables started getting vacuumed by pgsql user.
>> Any way that a vacuum would kick off for a particular table (or series of
>> tables) even when autovacuum was off in the postgresql.conf?
>
> Anti-transaction-wraparound vacuums, perhaps?

I would hope not. :)
This is postgres 8.2.X. Autovacuum has been enabled forever (seemingly with
no errors)
Anything I can look for ? (I searched the logs for references to "must be
vacuumed within" but found nothing....)

SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;

postgres 178649703

prod 204588751

template1 178653277

template0 178653131

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kalai R 2010-06-08 18:08:50 Query process is very slow
Previous Message uaca man 2010-06-08 18:01:16 Re: Queues Problem

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2010-06-08 18:15:41 Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-08 17:56:10 Re: 3rd time is a charm.....right sibling is not next child crash.