From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta(at)wp(dot)pl> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware |
Date: | 2007-03-20 17:01:40 |
Message-ID: | C6F49546-BD51-46EF-8A65-BFE60567CA3E@fastcrypt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 20-Mar-07, at 9:23 AM, Ireneusz Pluta wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I sent a similar post to a FreeBSD group, but thought I'd might try
> here too.
>
> I am completing a box for PostgreSQL server on FreeBSD. Selecting a
> RAID controller I decided to go with 3ware SE9650-16, following
> good opinions about 3ware controllers found on FreeBSD and
> PostgreSQL groups.
>
> However my dealer suggest me not to go with 3ware, and take Promise
> SuperTrak EX16350, instead. This suggestion does not have any
> technical background and it comes generally from the fact of
> limited availability of 16x 3ware controllers on the local market
> and immediate availability of Promise.
>
> Is this technically a good idea to take Promise instead of 3ware or
> rather I definitely should insist on 3ware and wait for it?
>
The reality is that most dealers have no idea what is "good" for a
database application. It is likely that this card is better for him
somehow ( more margin, easier to get, etc.)
I'd stick with 3ware, areca, or lsi. And even then I'd check it when
I got it to make sure it lived up to it's reputation.
Dave
> Thank you
>
> Ireneusz Pluta
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2007-03-20 18:08:23 | Re: SATA RAID: Promise vs. 3ware |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2007-03-20 16:17:10 | Re: how small to split a table? |