| From: | "Burd, Greg" <gregburd(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes |
| Date: | 2025-02-10 12:02:27 |
| Message-ID: | C6C63FAF-10EA-4E58-81C3-BA4F609541CC@amazon.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 9, 2025, at 1:14 AM, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> I think that the goal of this patch is interesting and desirable.
Thanks for taking a look at it. Which version did you prefer, v3 or v4?
> The greatest concern for me is the performance impact.
Agreed, I’m still looking for ways to minimize it (suggestions welcome).
> I think that a switch is warranted, but I am not sure if it should be a GUC.
> Wouldn't it be better to have a reloption, so that this can be configured per table?
I can remove the GUC in favor of a reloption, that makes sense to me.
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
best,
-greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | torikoshia | 2025-02-10 12:02:56 | Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-02-10 11:54:11 | Re: Doc: Move standalone backup section, mention -X argument |