Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>,Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>,Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Date: 2016-08-31 22:08:33
Message-ID: C5DE15D1-7CC3-4AF9-A778-F1C072F0BBEC@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On August 31, 2016 3:06:23 PM PDT, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

>In other painfully pedantic news, I should point out that
>sizeof(size_t) isn't necessarily word size (the most generic
>definition of word size for the architecture), contrary to my reading
>of the 0002-* patch comments. I'm mostly talking thinking about x86_64
>here, of course.

Uh?
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Fearing 2016-08-31 22:12:57 Re: autonomous transactions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-08-31 22:07:56 Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)