From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen R(dot) van den Berg <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Protocol 3, Execute, maxrows to return, impact? |
Date: | 2008-07-28 11:53:21 |
Message-ID: | C5BF64E6-D6BD-4DA9-9A8F-952A4C7B6C22@fastcrypt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27-Jul-08, at 3:00 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
> Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>> My Pike drivers now support multiple simultaneous portals and
>> automatic streaming by presending overlapping Execute statements with
>> a dynamically adapted fetchlimit calculated per select as the query
>> progresses.
>
> They also support COPY now.
>
> The driver beats libpq in speed by about 62%.
> The memory consumption is on demand, by row, and not the whole
> result set.
> Transport to and from the query is in binary and dynamically
> determined
> per datatype, no quoting necessary.
>
> Anyone interested in taking a peek at the (GPL copyright) driver, I
> temporarily put up a small package which contains the working driver
> in Pike at:
>
> http://admin.cuci.nl/psgsql.pike.tar.gz
>
This is very exciting news, I'd love to look at it, is there any way
it could be re-licensed so that it can be incorporated into say the
jdbc driver ?
Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2008-07-28 12:41:39 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-07-28 11:49:57 | Re: issues/experience with building postgres on Windows |