| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Extension Packaging & Lookup |
| Date: | 2024-11-25 21:45:59 |
| Message-ID: | C5759036-4F1F-468A-86D6-F8ECC6716EE1@justatheory.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Nov 13, 2024, at 16:38, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
> I came to this thinking that it was important to keep core (contrib, PL) extensions separate from non-core extensions, and if so, it’d be useful to have other defaults so that `make install` would go to the right one (site by default).
>
> But maybe it’s not necessary? If there are no extensions by default, perhaps it doesn’t matter?
I ripped out the core/vendor/site stuff and have now published a fairly detailed RFC.
https://justatheory.com/2024/11/rfc-extension-packaging-lookup/
What do you think, Hacker Friends?
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2024-11-25 22:15:25 | Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-11-25 21:39:13 | Re: Self contradictory examining on rel's baserestrictinfo |