From: | "Marc Mamin" <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "Andreas Kretschmer" <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pg-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Range-Types in 9.2 |
Date: | 2012-08-03 18:08:15 |
Message-ID: | C4DAC901169B624F933534A26ED7DF310F96B041@JENMAIL01.ad.intershop.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
hello,
agree about this great feature :)
There is another point I've wondered about:
Is there some logical reason why no function width(range) was added to the bundle ?
not a big deal, but width(range) looks just nicer than upper(range)-lower(range)
best regards,
Marc Mamin
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Jeff Davis
Sent: Fri 8/3/2012 7:42 PM
To: Andreas Kretschmer
Cc: pg-general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Range-Types in 9.2
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 17:06 +0200, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
> Hi all,
> great feature, but i can't find a TIMERANGE, i want to store time-ranges, for
> instance [10:00:00,16:00:00), how can i do that?
CREATE TYPE timerange AS RANGE ( subtype = time );
That's the simple answer. I believe we discussed including this as a
built-in range type at some point, but decided against it. I can't
remember the reason right now.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-03 18:25:16 | Re: Range-Types in 9.2 |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2012-08-03 17:42:26 | Re: Range-Types in 9.2 |