From: | "Marc Mamin" <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE INDEX as bottleneck |
Date: | 2010-11-11 20:05:27 |
Message-ID: | C4DAC901169B624F933534A26ED7DF31034BB8D7@JENMAIL01.ad.intershop.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
No, CONCURRENTLY is to improve table availability during index creation, but it degrades the performances.
best regards,
Marc Mamin
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Hunsaker [mailto:badalex(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 19:55
To: Marc Mamin
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] CREATE INDEX as bottleneck
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:41, Marc Mamin <M(dot)Mamin(at)intershop(dot)de> wrote:
> There are a few places in our data flow where we have to wait for index
> creation before being able to distribute the process on multiple threads
> again.
Would CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY help here?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2010-11-11 20:11:04 | Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan |
Previous Message | Jon Nelson | 2010-11-11 19:52:12 | Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan |