Re: [PERFORM] Parrallel query execution for UNION ALL Queries

From: "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, me(at)benjaminarai(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Parrallel query execution for UNION ALL Queries
Date: 2007-07-19 14:30:43
Message-ID: C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF8052256D7@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Dimitri,

> Seems to me that :
> - GreenPlum provides some commercial parallel query engine on top of
> PostgreSQL,

I certainly think so and so do our customers in production with 100s of
terabytes :-)

> - plproxy could be a solution to the given problem.
> https://developer.skype.com/SkypeGarage/DbProjects/PlProxy

This is solving real world problems at Skype of a different kind than
Greenplum, well worth checking out.

- Luke

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keaton Adams 2007-07-19 14:31:32 When is PostgreSQL 8.3 slated for release?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-07-19 14:13:47 Re: memory leakage in libpg?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-07-19 15:28:59 User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2007-07-19 10:14:29 Re: [PERFORM] Parrallel query execution for UNION ALL Queries