From: | "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Michael Stone" <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives |
Date: | 2007-05-30 15:21:21 |
Message-ID: | C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF802AF2F1B@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
It's created when the data is written to both drives.
This is standard stuff, very well proven: try googling 'self healing zfs'.
- Luke
Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Stone [mailto:mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:11 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:36:48AM -0400, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> I don't see how that's better at all; in fact, it reduces to
>> exactly the same problem: given two pieces of data which
>> disagree, which is right?
>
>The one that matches the checksum.
And you know the checksum is good, how?
Mike Stone
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-05-30 15:23:46 | Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives |
Previous Message | Michael Stone | 2007-05-30 15:09:30 | Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives |