Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration?

The outer track / inner track performance ratio is more like 40 percent. Recent example is 78MB/s outer and 44MB/s inner for the new Seagate 750MB drive (see http://www.storagereview.com for benchmark results)

- Luke

Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Nasby [mailto:decibel(at)decibel(dot)org]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 03:53 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: Pawel Gruszczynski
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] What`s wrong with JFS configuration?

On Apr 25, 2007, at 8:51 AM, Pawel Gruszczynski wrote:
> where u6 stores Fedora Core 6 operating system, and u0 stores 3
> partitions with ext2, ext3 and jfs filesystem.

Keep in mind that drives have a faster data transfer rate at the
outer-edge than they do at the inner edge, so if you've got all 3
filesystems sitting on that array at the same time it's not a fair
test. I heard numbers on the impact of this a *long* time ago and I
think it was in the 10% range, but I could be remembering wrong.

You'll need to drop each filesystem and create the next one to get a
fair comparison.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match