Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives

From: "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
To: "Peter Childs" <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives
Date: 2007-05-30 14:06:54
Message-ID: C282D30E.31B69%llonergan@greenplum.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Peter,

On 5/30/07 12:29 AM, "Peter Childs" <peterachilds(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Good point, also if you had Raid 1 with 3 drives with some bit errors at least
> you can take a vote on whats right. Where as if you only have 2 and they
> disagree how do you know which is right other than pick one and hope... But
> whatever it will be slower to keep in sync on a heavy write system.

Much better to get a RAID system that checksums blocks so that "good" is
known. Solaris ZFS does that, as do high end systems from EMC and HDS.

- Luke

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Luke Lonergan 2007-05-30 14:09:02 Re: Bad RAID1 read performance
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-05-30 12:08:25 Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives