| From: | Adam Witney <awitney(at)sgul(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: File systems linux !!! |
| Date: | 2007-05-01 08:43:08 |
| Message-ID: | C25CBC2C.E49B%awitney@sgul.ac.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 30/4/07 16:22, in article 463609BA(dot)9010607(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de, "Hannes
Dorbath" <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de> wrote:
> Excluding warehousing setups, where XFS might give some benefit, any
> modern file system on Linux should perform OK. I'd use what I'm
> comfortable with. In case your data set fits in RAM, it will stay in OS
> buffers all the time anyway.
>
> My choice is XFS, but I wouldn't recommend XFS to anyone unsure to what
> FS to use. There is far to much someone new XFS can do wrong.
Hi,
Could you give a couple of examples of things that could be done wrong? I
have XFS running for my data partition, but I didn't really do much when I
set it up...
Thanks for any advice
adam
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Srinivas Kotapally | 2007-05-01 13:20:34 | Intermittent Postgres Connection refused Errors (JDBC) |
| Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2007-04-30 16:32:05 | Re: Fwd: File systems linux !!! |