Re: PostgreSQL gaps wrt to java, and jdbc

From: Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Wooten <kdubb(at)me(dot)com>, Markus KARG <markus(at)headcrashing(dot)eu>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL gaps wrt to java, and jdbc
Date: 2015-07-07 21:03:48
Message-ID: C244B1B4-A157-4667-8CF1-53A7D2D7AC0B@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc


On Jul 7, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:

> My assumption has been that the true binary format is something dictated by Javascript engine (I assume it would be V8 since Pl/V8 exists). So it seems we could just glean it from there and need no other transmitted information besides that “standard”.
>
> Not having followed JS too closely are there other binary formats besides V8 ?

http://wiki.fasterxml.com/SmileFormatSpec

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Travis Wellman 2015-07-13 17:51:50 supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2015-07-07 20:59:26 Re: PostgreSQL gaps wrt to java, and jdbc