Re: Date created for tables

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Date created for tables
Date: 2019-12-24 19:14:29
Message-ID: C23A2A0A-EA2B-4D00-9E36-7B7271CDCFC0@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> If there's not enough time and motivation for the developers to implement CREATED_ON and LAST_ALTERED in pg_class, then you should have said that in the first place. We're adults; we understand that OSS projects have limited resources, and won't go off and pout in the corner.
>
> But that's not what y'all said. "It's too complicated, mission creep, blah blah blah" just extended way too long.
>>
Is there a list of purported uses cases for these two attributes (other than auditing)? Especially anything to do with managing the data as they currently exist?

>
> --
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2019-12-24 19:47:56 Re: Date created for tables
Previous Message Ron 2019-12-24 18:31:49 Re: Date created for tables